While Hollywood's writing community may find solace in the recent AI restrictions that contributed to the end of the strike, this is just the beginning of many battles to come.
Viewing these as protective bulwarks could be as misplaced as the faith once placed in the Maginot Line. The belief that AI-written content won't be recognized as source material and that AI will never be anointed the title of 'writer' might feel like fortified defenses. However, just as the Maginot Line was outflanked in history, these protective measures could easily be bypassed by the relentless advances of Silicon Valley in the filmmaking arena. The real peril isn't just from the direct threat of established studios attempting to integrate AI for cost-cutting but from a broader terrain outside Hollywood's Maginot Line of defenses. A threat unburdened by unions, guilds, or traditional Hollywood agreements. Here, AI has the potential to dominate every facet of filmmaking, making the age-old pillars of the cinematic world obsolete.
In this week’s "The Brief," my aim is to elucidate precisely how Silicon Valley will sidestep Hollywood's Maginot Line. The intent behind shedding light on this intricate strategy is to empower those nestled in the heart of Hollywood with the foreknowledge they'll need to mount a response. I will methodically walk you through a two-decade timeline, detailing how Silicon Valley, employing the "Generational Axiom" (the principle that posits new technological paradigms gain traction and acceptance by targeting younger, more adaptable generations first), will weave their AI-driven narratives seamlessly from scripting to screening within the minds and hearts of our youth. All of this will be executed outside the prevailing distribution channels that streaming and broadcast giants currently command.
Be forewarned: this issue may be a challenging one to read, confronting us with uncomfortable truths. However, let it also be known that at the journey's end, hope does linger, coupled with actionable steps that can steer the ship to more favorable waters.
Ok, now grab that cup of coffee… or tea. Later you might need a whisky.
From the Greatest Generation, which navigated through global conflicts and economic tribulations, to the Boomers, witnesses to profound cultural and social evolutions, every generation is indelibly sculpted by its distinct historical tapestry. Generation X, coming of age in the nascent era of personal computing, paved the way for Millennials, who matured in tandem with the digital explosion. Following suit is Generation Z, inherently adapted to a digitally interwoven world. Today, as we stand on the cusp of another paradigm shift with the looming advent of Generation AI—a generation for whom artificial intelligence is an everyday fixture—we anticipate their potential to uniquely shape industries like film and television.
This reshaping is but a chapter in the timeless narrative of generational evolution. In this ever-flowing river of change, a central theme persists: the relationship between each generation and its contemporary technology. With every new generation, forefront innovations become the norm, seamlessly woven into the fabric of their daily lives. In contrast, their predecessors often view these same advancements as signposts of tumultuous, transformative epochs, markers of swift and sometimes unsettling change. This age-old interplay recurs, with the young embracing with ease what might seem daunting to those who came before.
And Silicon Valley knows this.
Silicon Valley has keenly observed and internalized this generational dance. Employing a Trojan Horse strategy, these tech behemoths discreetly introduce disruptive technologies—and by extension, their vested enterprises—into the receptive arms of the new generation and then over a period of 20 years, move up market to capture everyone.
This dynamic underscores the Generational Axiom: a sociological insight suggesting that startups, driven by capitalist ambitions and armed with new technologies, frequently sideline established consumers (and also workers) within an industry. Instead, they tend to leverage younger consumers and workers as a strategic entry point, akin to a Trojan Horse, into a pre-existing ecosystem.
In the ensuing discourse, I aim to unravel the intricacies of this AI integration: How will this technological proliferation unfurl over the coming two decades? What implications does it carry for content creation, curation, and consumption? Furthermore, we will delve into the repercussions for the current Hollywood workforce and, on a broader scale, reflect upon the societal metamorphosis this might induce. Join me as we navigate the nexus of tech, entertainment, and culture in this age of AI ascendancy. Let's commence by getting acquainted with the "who" behind this strategic maneuver.
Hollywood, meet Generation AI - His name is Chad, he’s 19, and he lives in his mother’s basement.
Under the lens of the Generational Axiom, a peculiar divergence arises, marking the vast chasm between classic Hollywood and the emergent visionaries. These young startup entrepreneurs, products of an era where technology molds perspectives, are a different breed altogether. These individuals don’t harbor animosity or a desire to decimate Hollywood - in fact, in most cases they aren’t even aware of its history, people, or art in most cases. They simply yearn to carve out their own niche, leveraging AI to forge their vision. However, blinded by ambition and technological prowess, they may remain oblivious to the potential societal tremors their innovations could spark, potentially sidelining the very foundations of traditional cinema.
Let's craft a comprehensive character profile for these trailblazers. By delving deep into their psyche and motivations, we can gain clarity on the trajectory of their influence and the unfolding narrative they may shape if left unchecked.
Different Sub-Species - But Humans. Before delving into the details that follow, it's essential to understand that they are as human as anyone else. They are the younger generation, individuals with good hearts, who genuinely desire a better world. However, it's crucial to recognize that they represent a distinct breed of backgrounds, beliefs, and mission.
Youthful Disruptors. Aged between 18-24, they bring a fresh perspective, uninfluenced by decades of industry traditions. Their young age means they're bold, eager to redefine norms, and not afraid to replace age-old techniques, even if it means sidelining experienced professionals.
Their Heros Aren’t Yours. Generation-AI does not venerate directors, actors, or cinematographers, instead they look up to titans of industry, brilliant engineers, and the misfits who have changed the world.
Unaware. No knowledge, or care to know, how films and television shows are made today. They do not value the jobs, the workflow, and the processes that have been established over the past many decades.
No Relationships and No Guilt. They are not part of the Hollywood ecosystem. Most do not know writers, directors, actors, or any of the people it takes to make a movie or television show. They will not know any of the people who may no longer have jobs as a result of their innovations.
No History. Unable to name, or know, movies and television shows in depth. The who and why each movie or television show represented something important, breakthrough, or a failure.
Practical Education. Absent from art, writing, or film schools, their education is grounded in fields like engineering and data science. Their departure from conventional artistic training means they might disregard traditional filmmaking methodologies, seeing them as outdated or inefficient.
Gamer's Mentality. Many will come from the gaming industry and they're accustomed to the virtual, interactive world - not a static baked world. They see movies and TV shows as another form of 'game,' where narratives can be algorithmically generated, characters are NPCs, and settings are mere digital constructs. This perspective may entirely shift the narrative from storytelling to user engagement.
Efficiency Over Art. Their prime value is efficiency. For them, if a movie can be produced faster using algorithms, why involve a human director, scriptwriter, or cinematographer? This efficiency-driven approach could lead to the mechanization of the creative process, where artistry takes a backseat.
AI as the New Muse. They believe amalgamating AI with art is groundbreaking. If an AI can mimic the style of great filmmakers by analyzing past movies, isn't that a brilliant way to continue the legacy? The reliance on AI for creative inspiration might mean overlooking the originality and unique touch that human artists bring.
Empowering the Unskilled. For them, the idea that anyone, even without artistic talent, can produce art via AI prompts is revolutionary not offensive. This democratization of content creation can be seen as empowering but also threatens the very essence of specialized skills in Hollywood.
Product-Driven Mentality. They see content as a vehicle, primarily to promote other tech products or ideas. In their world, a movie might just be an extended tech advertisement. Such a shift can fundamentally alter the spirit of storytelling, making it more commercial and less emotional.
Lone Creator Vision. Imagines a world where an individual can produce content without collaboration, using AI. This perspective may spell the end of collaborative film-making, where multiple talents come together to create magic.
Risk-Takers. Willing to challenge the status quo, they're unafraid to test uncharted territories. Their bold endeavors might push the boundaries of content creation, but could also lead to an industry where calculated risks replace genuine creativity.
Customization is King. They see AI as a way to scale the ability to produce customize “made to order” content for everyone - instantly.
These AI pioneers represent a distinct evolution in the realm of innovation. Not inherently malicious, their motivations and actions stem from a unique blend of values, ethics, and experiential backgrounds that markedly differ from those of preceding generations. Their perspectives are shaped by a different set of cultural, technological, and philosophical touchpoints, which, in turn, influences their approach to problem-solving, creativity, and business. This divergence in DNA inherently dictates that the products, services, and solutions they introduce bear the unmistakable imprint of their distinct identity. The essence of what they create is inexorably linked to who they are.
So let’s talk about “What” these people will create.
Drawing inspiration from their technological inclinations and their penchant for efficiency and customization, they envision a system where content birth is purely computational. A mere prompt acts as the seed, and from it sprouts a fully-realized film, an episodic series, or perhaps an entirely new genre of digital expression yet to be coined. The culmination of this process is content, but not content as we've traditionally understood it. There will be distinguishing features that characterize these AI-driven creations:
AI-Driven End-to-End Production. From script to screen, every element is autonomously generated by artificial intelligence. The age-old roles we've celebrated - writers, directors, actors, and even concept artists - are replaced by algorithms. In this world, the power of unions, studios, and actors is irrelevant.
Made-to-Order Content. Tailored films or episodes crafted based on viewer specifications, serving almost bespoke entertainment experiences.
Adaptive Storytelling. The content isn't static; it evolves and adapts depending on who's watching, ensuring maximum engagement.
Interactivity as a Standard. Passive viewing evolves into a dynamic interaction, blurring the lines between games and traditional content.
Decentralized Distribution. Bypassing conventional streaming platforms, networks, or cinemas, these films find their audience through novel mediums, perhaps even decentralized platforms. In this world broadcast and streaming are irrelevant.
Ultra-Short to Ultra-Long Formats. From bite-sized narratives lasting mere minutes to potentially days-long epics, the AI caters to every attention span.
Hybrid Content Genres. Merging documentaries with sci-fi or romance with horror in seamless, unpredictable blends that defy our current genre classifications.
Global Reach with Local Touch. Content automatically adapts to cultural nuances, ensuring relevance across the globe.
Personal Injection. The injection of you, or your child, or your avatar into the what you are watching in order to make it more meaningful for you.
Direct Audience Feedback Loop. AI learns from viewer feedback in real-time, refining subsequent content almost instantaneously.
Monetization and Engagement Fusion. Storylines or content elements might merge with real-world products or services, creating an intertwined experience of entertainment and commerce.
Given this paradigm, it becomes evident that the "What" of the content Generation AI produces is deeply rooted in the "Who" of their foundational beliefs, values, and technological alignment.
But much of this sounds like pie in the sky type stuff. A number of questions emerge don’t they?
The current marriage of AI and filmmaking presents palpable shortcomings. While the notion of sidestepping real actors might seem futuristic, in today's cinematic landscape, it arguably poses a formidable barrier to securing funding. There's an inimitable allure and marketability associated with star-studded casts that AI simply cannot emulate, at least for now. Furthermore, AI-generated visual renders, such as those produced by platforms like RunwayML and Pika Labs, are still in their infancy. Their output, often riddled with glitches and inconsistencies, can border on the comical when juxtaposed with the high-resolution, intricate details of modern cinematography.
So, how will the AI revolution in filmmaking actually commence? It’s time to grab that whisky.
It will start with children. Children, with their untainted perceptions and open minds, will be the initial target audience for AI-driven films and television shows - it’s Trojan Horse. Consider this: the value we place on actors—recognizing them, awaiting their next performance—is a cultural construct passed down through generations. Yet, every generation needs to be retaught this appreciation, and without it, we're just one generational shift away from actors fading into irrelevance. Additionally, children's narratives are uncomplicated. They don’t necessitate intricate plots, multi-layered dialogues, or convoluted character arcs—all of which are well within the current capabilities of AI. Today's animation technologies, particularly those harnessed by platforms like Midjourney and RunwayML, are more than adept at crafting the simplistic visuals that enchant young viewers.
Next will be the parents. Now, envision real-time cartoons with features tailored for parents needs —where they can seamlessly feed in the morals, values, and even political stances they wish to instill in their young ones - a parental prompt engine. Picture a world where parents, looking for a brief respite or a means to keep their kids engaged, can simply cue up hours of bespoke content; content designed to resonate with their unique family ethos. What if they could pick any from a roster of their child's favorite cartoons, and customize them? And what if all of this were available at an affordable monthly subscription, say $19.99? An AI-powered engine, producing thousands of tailor-made episodes hourly, all tuned to the individual preferences and belief systems of each household.
This future isn't a distant dream—it's on our horizon, set to arrive this very year. E.g. these startups are being prototyped and funded now.
Now let's fast forward 5-10 years. Children who once were aged between 2 to 10 have now matured, their worldviews formed almost exclusively by AI-driven content, and they are now teenagers. To them, traditional broadcast television or pre-set episodic series seem archaic, a relic of their parents' past. They understand the lens of content through AI-created characters, not through actors their parents would have told them are famous. With the passage of time, AI, too, has matured. What was once suitable only for crafting children's cartoons has evolved. This enhanced AI can now generate content tailored to the tastes of teenagers: more intricate storylines, longer narratives, and visuals ranging from stylized photo-realism to absolute realism. Characters portrayed by this AI have seamlessly traversed the "Uncanny Valley." For these teens, consuming AI-generated content is not an innovation; it's the status quo - it has grown up with them. The very idea of reverting to traditional, non-adaptive content seems inconceivable.
These teenagers, equipped with a degree of autonomy, can now input their own content prompts—albeit under the watchful eyes of their parents. They have the power to curate content reflective of their real-life experiences and emotions, be it seeking solace post a breakup or guidance in handling a tricky social scenario. Overlay this scenario with the parental controls: ethical, political, and social directives preset into the system. This creates a unique, family-centric world model where children grow, guided not just by organic experiences, but by AI-enhanced content tailored to reinforce their parents' values.
Then over the next 10 years, the parents adopt AI-driven content. As children immerse themselves in AI-driven content, it becomes an integral part of their daily lives, a norm that parents can't help but notice. Drawn by curiosity and the desire to understand, monitor, or even control their children's interactions with such content, parents start experimenting with the platform. A similar shift occurred with the rise of Facebook. Initially adopted en masse by the younger generation, parents joined in droves, initially to keep tabs on their offspring's activities. As they became familiar with the platform, they began using it for their own social interactions and networking. Analogously, parents could be enticed by the customizability of AI-prompted content. Picture a mother tailoring a workout video to her precise fitness level and goals or a father fine-tuning a DIY tutorial to his specific home repair needs. Or consider couples crafting bespoke movie nights, combining their favorite genres and plot elements into a unique cinematic experience.
And finally, and importantly, consider parents crafting their own news network where the whole family gets their “news.”
The Generational Mirror Effect. This phenomenon, where older generations adopt a technology or platform in response to its prevalence among their younger counterparts, can be termed the "Generational Mirror Effect". It's the reflection of youthful trends in older demographics, triggered by the intent to understand, supervise, or simply stay connected, but ultimately leading to the older generation finding utility and purpose for themselves in that very trend.
Does this sound like the future you want?
Left unchecked, this future could usher in a myriad of unintended consequences. By confining values and ethics to the individual family level, we risk crafting isolated echo chambers, devoid of diverse perspectives and resistant to external voices. Our shared history and collective experiences stand in jeopardy, liable to be overwritten by the narratives chosen by AI 'victors'—those who set the prompts and the parameters.
Now, factor in the inherent bias of the Learning Language Models (LLMs) behind these AIs. Imagine if these engines became politically charged. We could have a liberal AI churning out content on one end, a conservative AI on the other, or even an AI influenced by figures like former President Trump. Given his foray into the Truth social network, is the inception of a TruthGPT content engine truly a stretch of the imagination? In such a world, children, swathed in these AI-defined realities, might never learn to question or cross-check the "truths" handed to them. The very essence of history becomes malleable, reshaped by the whims of the AI's handlers, and the lines between factual knowledge and opinion blur, deepening societal rifts and eroding our shared foundation of truth.
And a byproduct of this dystopian future would be the end of Hollywood.
A bit of history to drive home the point. In ecological terms, a keystone species is one whose impact on its environment is disproportionately large relative to its abundance. When such a species is removed, it sets off a chain of events, leading to drastic changes in the ecosystem, often culminating in its total collapse. A historical instance of this was witnessed in the 1960s with the sea otters off the coast of Alaska. Due to excessive hunting and subsequent depletion, their numbers dwindled, leading to a surge in the sea urchin population, their primary prey. The unchecked urchins decimated kelp forests, leading to a decline in fish populations and ultimately damaging the marine ecosystem. The gravity of this situation wasn't truly understood until sea otter protections were put in place, and the kelp forests began to rejuvenate.
In the same vein, consider Hollywood's intricate ecosystem.
Here, actors play the role of the keystone species. Their sway extends well beyond mere on-screen presence, underpinning a vast network of professions, institutions, and economic frameworks. In a world where Hollywood’s Maginot Line has been circumvented and Generation AI grows up never knowing, or being taught, the value of human actors, what happens to this keystone species? Should they ever be sidelined or deemed inconsequential in this new AI-driven world, the ripple effect could be catastrophic. The grand structure of Hollywood, without its foundational keystone, stands at risk of disintegration.
But what can be done?
To avert a future dominated by hyper-segmented AI content that skirts the truth and historicity, and to ensure the continued relevance of actors as the linchpin of Hollywood, we must take proactive measures today. Picture this impending scenario as a colossal asteroid on a collision course with Earth. When detected early enough, as with the asteroid Apophis which once seemed destined for a perilous pass by our planet, even a slight course correction can steer it away from disaster. Small, timely interventions can have monumental impacts on outcome trajectories.
So, how do we make that vital intervention now? How can we leverage AI's immense potential without hurtling towards that dystopian horizon?
In envisioning a world dominated by AI content, parallels can be drawn to a once feared food future where only GMO-certified crops and heavily processed foods reign supreme. Comparing the trajectories of the United States and Europe gives insightful glimpses into how societies choose to adapt to or resist emerging technologies. The U.S., often hailed for its rapid embrace of advancements, has largely welcomed GMOs and processed foods, favoring their economic scalability and extended shelf life. On the other hand, Europe, with its deep-rooted traditions and protective food standards, has been more cautious. One glaring example lies in wheat production. In the U.S., modern wheat strains, often modified for higher yields, have been linked to rising gluten intolerance. Meanwhile, European countries, more resistant to GMO wheat, report fewer such cases.
The point here isn't to critique but to highlight that societal values play an instrumental role in shaping the technological landscape. Just as 'organic' has carved out its revered niche amidst the sprawling fast-food jungles, in a future where AI-generated content becomes the norm - the ubiquitous McDonald’s of content, there will always be a space for "certified organic content". But, much like the organic food movement, if we desire authentic, unmodified content, it’s a space we’ll have to consciously and actively champion. It won't simply materialize on its own.
So how can we start a Certified Organic film movement?
To proactively steer the impending AI asteroid towards a future that values both innovation and traditional artistry, three distinct strategies should be pursued. Firstly, forging connections with Generation AI filmmakers is of paramount importance. By establishing a rapport and understanding with these pioneers, we can foster discussions about the broader implications of their groundbreaking work, ensuring they remain grounded and aware of the cultural and societal impacts. Secondly, it's essential to cultivate a discerning viewer base that holds organic filmmaking in high regard. By championing the merits of human-crafted narratives, performances, and directorial visions, we can instill a genuine appreciation for the nuances and depth of traditional filmmaking. Lastly, spotlighting and financially supporting standout examples of organic films can serve as a testament to their enduring value and potential. By nurturing these films, we not only preserve the art form but also inspire others to see the merit in balancing technology with innate human creativity.
The "Asteroid Nudgers" Checklist.
Educate Generation AI filmmakers. Every time I talk to one of the “world destroying Generation AI” filmmakers, I see a common theme. They care about our world too, and once they hear these concepts, they agree too that we should be careful about the world we are creating.
Introduce Hollywood and Generation AI Filmmakers. We should host conferences that bring both sides together, get to agreement that we care about our future, and that we can perhaps create it together.
Certified Organic Rating System. Much like the "R" rating for films, an "AI" rating could be introduced, categorizing the extent to which a movie or TV show has been generated or augmented by AI. It would provide transparency, allowing viewers to make informed decisions.
Educational Content. Produce documentaries, short films, and even TikTok videos geared towards younger audiences and their parents. These pieces would shed light on the implications of AI in content creation and the value of human touch in artistry.
AI Awareness Campaigns. Launch digital and traditional media campaigns that make people cognizant of the sweeping changes AI brings and the merits of preserving human-driven storytelling.
Engage Influencers and Celebrities. Collaborate with popular figures to emphasize the uniqueness of human-generated content. Their influence can make a significant difference in shaping perceptions.
Interactive Workshops. Organize workshops for young filmmakers, writers, and viewers. These sessions can provide hands-on understanding of the differences between AI-generated and human-created content.
Oscar’s are for Humans. Institute awards or recognition events that specifically honor content made without AI interference. Highlighting and praising these achievements can motivate creators and viewers alike.
Viewer's Choice. Encourage platforms to allow users to filter content based on its creation process. If viewers actively choose human-made stories, platforms will cater more to that demand.
School Programs. Integrate modules in school curriculums that focus on the significance of human artistry, fostering appreciation from a young age.
Fund the Change You Wish to See. Studios, acting as financial guardian, can participate by funding AI ventures that are working to create a positive future with the benefit of AI rather than being controlled by it.
For humans, art functions as a reflective surface, an intimate mirror we peer into to grasp the very essence of our being. This impending skirmish isn't merely over jobs or roles in the entertainment landscape; it touches the heart of creation itself. Who will be the craftsmen of our art? The maestros shaping the mirror? If AI emerges as the predominant artist, it isn’t humanity that will find reflection in the art, but rather AI examining and learning from its own constructs.
And that can’t and shouldn’t happen.
Throughout history, our society has often embraced innovation without adequately weighing its sociological consequences. Take, for instance, Facebook's erstwhile mantra: "move fast and break things." This mindset, though seemingly progressive, unintentionally precipitated a set of challenges that extended far beyond the digital realm. What Facebook inadvertently "broke" in their rapid advancement wasn't just code—it was fragments of the very fabric of our society.
But as easy as it would be to just blame Silicon Valley, it's paramount to understand that neither AI nor the trailblazing spirits of Generation AI are the inherent culprits. Our most pressing concern is the declining space for genuine discourse and the gradual eclipse of critical thinking in our communities - the old and the new. The path we carve with AI isn't a fixed destiny but a conscious choice. And as with any powerful tool, while it can greatly enhance our lives, left unchecked, it also possesses the potential to reshape our collective narrative. Central to this is an earnest call for proactive engagement—a responsibility to mold and not just mirror our shared future.
The inaugural step on this journey is to be equipped with insight, and it's my aspiration that these articles serve that very purpose.
The subsequent phase is decisive action. I am setting forth on a mission to kickstart one of these 'Asteroid Nudgers'—a documentary film series that delves into the intricate dance between AI and filmmaking, laying bare the commendable, the concerning, and the contentious. A space where power is confronted by unadulterated truth, a vibrant spirit, and an unwavering faith in a more enlightened mode of existence. If this vision resonates with you and you feel compelled to champion this cause, I implore you to share this article far and wide. For those who envision an active role in the conception and realization of this documentary, your collaborative spirit is more than welcome.
Reach out to me directly at steve.e.newcomb@gmail.com.
Paid subscribers receive an early draft of my article every Monday before its Friday release, allowing for feedback. If you're an industry professional eager to contribute, consider supporting with a paid subscription.
What is The Brief and Who should read it?
I release a weekly digest every Friday, tailored for professionals ranging from executives to writers, directors, cinematographers, editors, and anyone actively involved in the film and television domain. This briefing offers a comprehensive yet accessible perspective on the convergence of technology and its implications for the movie and TV industry. It serves as an efficient gateway to understanding the nexus between Hollywood and Silicon Valley.
What’s the format of The Brief?
In the evolving landscape of Film and Television, concerns about the repercussions of rapid technological advancements are growing. Many in the industry fear that innovations, like AI, could threaten job security, while there's an unease that corporations might put profit margins ahead of fair compensation. But history, particularly from past technological waves in Silicon Valley, offers us valuable lessons. In this weekly analysis, I'll juxtapose historical context with present-day developments, aiming to provide clear and informed insights into how the industry is being reshaped — acknowledging the challenges but also spotlighting the new horizons.
Who am I?
I'm Steve Newcomb. Functionally, I’m a recovering Silicon Valley founder that is finally old enough to have a bit of care. I’m perhaps most recognized for founding Powerset— it was the largest AI and machine learning project in the world when I founded it. It was later acquired by Microsoft and transformed into something you might recognize today - Microsoft Bing. Beyond Bing, I had the privilege of being on the pioneering team that witnessed the inaugural email sent via a mobile device. My journey also led me to SRI (Stanford Research Institute), where we laid the groundwork for contemporary speech recognition technology. Additionally, I was a co-founder of the debut company to introduce a 3D physics engine in Javascript. I've held positions on the board of directors and contributed funding to massive open source initiatives like NodeJS and even the largest such project, jQuery. My experience extends to academia, having been a senior fellow at the University of California, Berkeley's engineering and business faculties. Recently, I ventured into Layer 2 internet protocols and assisted a company named Matter Labs in securing $440 million in funding to bolster their endeavors.
What am I doing besides writing these posts?
Typically, I allocate a year between groundbreaking ventures. My exploration for the upcoming project commenced in May 2023, and the sole certainty is its nexus with the film, television, SMURF, and AI domains. Sharing insights on my research endeavors helps me discern between feasible prospects and mere illusions. My hope is that for this venture, I appropriately consider the ethical and sociological repercussions.
If you are interested in contacting me, being interviewed, being helped, or yelling at me, my email is steve.e.newcomb@gmail.com.